Alligator Blood 1,444 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 3 hours ago, taylorslilhoe said: Good its what she deserves Ok Taylor's little hoe Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Olive 422 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 17 hours ago, Florian said: Freedom of expression ?! YouTube is the product of a private company. It's their right to choose what to host or not on their websites. Let's not act like Deepthroat is YouTube friendly in the first place I'm not saying that they don't have the right to do it. I'm just saying it's a bad thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,462 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 What do you expect? YT is Google owned. Google donât even allow this cult site to use the words G0dga or DĂźck or else admin wonât get his Google adsense payment that keep this site running. (ïŸâăźâ)ïŸâ§*:ïœ„ïŸ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*ÂŽèžïœ*) âĄâĄâĄ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creyk 16,836 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 20 hours ago, 666 others said: People have the option to not watch her content. Â I don't, for example. Why remove her from YT? Because her content is too over sexualized and shouldn't be made available in the first place. It's okay to be sexual but she is doing TOO much and ther are no redeeming qualities about that or the rest of her work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jessica Germ 1,612 Posted March 21, 2018 Author Share Posted March 21, 2018 10 minutes ago, Creyk said: Because her content is too over sexualized and shouldn't be made available in the first place. It's okay to be sexual but she is doing TOO much and ther are no redeeming qualities about that or the rest of her work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alligator Blood 1,444 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 12 minutes ago, Creyk said: Because her content is too over sexualized and shouldn't be made available in the first place. It's okay to be sexual but she is doing TOO much and ther are no redeeming qualities about that or the rest of her work. tbh the only time she went overly sexualized was the Duck Duck Goose music video, those realistic dildos and the way she was slurping them was graphic but that's about it. the rest is okay as long it is 18+ protected, nothing pop stars like rihanna or nicky minaj haven't done before Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymore 671 Posted March 21, 2018 Share Posted March 21, 2018 54 minutes ago, saturn said: tbh the only time she went overly sexualized was the Duck Duck Goose music video, those realistic dildos and the way she was slurping them was graphic but that's about it. the rest is okay as long it is 18+ protected, nothing pop stars like rihanna or nicky minaj haven't done before or gaga Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.