MonsterMum 2,532 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 You're 100% right...Thanks for correcting me! My pleasure Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HausOfMiklaus 1,803 Posted March 8, 2014 Share Posted March 8, 2014 Fockety fock fock. What kind of mess is this. :rip: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RAMROD 96,434 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 Pressed. I am happy some company paid her to perform again tbh. It's been 84 years since her last live performance tbh! So whatever haters say tbh. (ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ✧*:･ﾟ be delulu until it becomes trululu (*´艸｀*) ♡♡♡ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emvee 7,080 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 :lmao: what kind of tumblr blogger article was THAT?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
llbcherry 591 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 I find it amazing that they published this without looking into whether Gaga would be contributing to charity. Then they had to publish this addendum saying, oh wait, she actually totally is, yet stubbornly implying that it might not be enough. It's very silly. They should feel embarrassed. They did the same thing later in the article again with the festival itself. If you have to publish more than one retraction, you should just take the damned thing down. This can't be how journalism - or even just blogging - works. There has to be some level of accountability. YAAAAAAAAAAASSSSS! Haha, I never say that, but, SO MUCH TRUTH. Shame #1: journalism; authenticity not required Shame #2: anyone praising Perez for anything. :roll: Enough is enough. Just- UGH. :giveup: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaga is Life 90 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 Get Gaga that attention Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
unfitted 0 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 Is the writer Perez's friend? Idk I'm just disappointed reading those kind of articles, especially in Forbes. I thought they have really good writers but in fact they just have the silly ones. Won't believe them anymore Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.