lastpopicon 29,074 Posted May 31 Author Share Posted May 31 (edited) And Wikipedia now reports the CORRECT numbers Edited May 31 by lastpopicon The melody that you choose can rescue you 5 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ladle Ghoulash 22,477 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 (edited) 12 minutes ago, lastpopicon said: other than Rod Stewart's, Jorge Ben and Jean-Michel have more or equal than gaga, they don't count as standalone acts? Either way, insane achievement Those were both also part of holiday celebrations (80th anniversary of Moscow and NYE) Edited May 31 by Ladle Ghoulash We have forgotten our public MANNERS 2 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guillaume Hamon 6,417 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 3 hours ago, lastpopicon said: can someone edit wikipedia That's the first thing I had in mind since some Coldplay fan on Wiki kept removing my edits along the weeks. 😆 Always complaining about "little monsters inflating Gaga's numbers, being so annoying etc" and here we are with Daddy Guinness validation. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastpopicon 29,074 Posted May 31 Author Share Posted May 31 2 minutes ago, Guillaume Hamon said: That's the first thing I had in mind since some Coldplay fan on Wiki kept removing my edits along the weeks. 😆 Always complaining about "little monsters inflating Gaga's numbers, being so annoying etc" and here we are with Daddy Guinness validation. some very upset people really tried to push that 2.1M narrative, they failed The melody that you choose can rescue you 1 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guillaume Hamon 6,417 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 15 minutes ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Those were both also part of holiday celebrations (80th anniversary of Moscow and NYE) Yep technically she's the very first artist to reach this number on her name alone. As you said the few others who did better did so with the help of big National events celebrations so we'll never know if it's what made them be "higher" than Gaga or not. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nessun Dorma 6,701 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 21 minutes ago, lastpopicon said: And Wikipedia now reports the CORRECT numbers I know it was you 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastpopicon 29,074 Posted May 31 Author Share Posted May 31 11 minutes ago, Nessun Dorma said: I know it was you The melody that you choose can rescue you 1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastpopicon 29,074 Posted May 31 Author Share Posted May 31 Every pop act under the sun will try to surpass this now. Gaga set the bar incredibly high, and the most impressive, Madonna already set the bar insanely high last year, her 1.6M attendance is impressive and gaga beating that by almost 1M is a great honor. The melody that you choose can rescue you 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightyriverz 2,585 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 lol where is pawsdownlittlemonsters now Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mightyriverz 2,585 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 1 hour ago, lastpopicon said: And Wikipedia now reports the CORRECT numbers LADY GAGA >>>>>>>> poor donna Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyanDante 6,057 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 Good, people can now stop obsessing for the numbers. Every thread during copacabana would be plagued with, “is it 2.4, but I read 2.1, why is she lying” I'm not very good with Social Mediaᵀᴹ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattbri 1,366 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 yay! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lastpopicon 29,074 Posted May 31 Author Share Posted May 31 5 minutes ago, CyanDante said: Good, people can now stop obsessing for the numbers. Every thread during copacabana would be plagued with, “is it 2.4, but I read 2.1, why is she lying” i have flashbacks The melody that you choose can rescue you 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyanDante 6,057 Posted May 31 Share Posted May 31 46 minutes ago, lastpopicon said: i have flashbacks Is that Trisha Paytas I'm not very good with Social Mediaᵀᴹ 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrawberryBlond 14,775 Posted June 1 Share Posted June 1 4 hours ago, Ladle Ghoulash said: Genuinely wild that they feel like they need to qualify it with “female” when the acknowledgement literally states that it is the most attended standalone concert in history and that Rod Stewart’s numbers are believed to be inflated due to the NYE firework celebration that came after it. Largest standalone concert of all time, iktr Because males tend to have the highest achievements in the music industry, for the most part. Or a woman sets a record but a man swoops in and takes it later. Sad, but true. That's why, when it comes to touring records, there's a different Wikipedia section for female achievements because, as great as those achievements are, they pale in comparison to male touring acts. If there was no female section, those women would've been a footnote except for Taylor, Beyonce and maybe Pink. A female sections means they're on top. Even Gaga can't beat their totals so the qualifier of "female" makes her more likely to hold onto the record for longer, maybe even forever. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.