Versace 7,311 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 If anything it should be the opposite The rich don’t need to get richer It would be thoughtful of streaming services to help upcoming and independent artists and writers in any shape or form Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstermilo 2,735 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 i hate how ppl like him and taylor act like they are in need of more money from streaming services, when 1 quarter of america cant even pay their rent or put food on their tables...... how greedy can u be, when ur worth hundreds of millions of dollars and have so many streams of income Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherry 3,973 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 Who listens to him. I mean I have never seen any of my friends or family members listening to his music and even my students dislike him. The only song I've ever heard of his playing at my campus cafeteria was Hotline Bling. Love it when you call me legs, in the morning buy me eggs 🥚 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
the plastix doll 50 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 11 hours ago, Squidward T said: Without the label backing them, they wouldn’t be making anything. You know how much it takes to promote an artist. The advertising costs alone are substantial which is understandable however after the label takes thier cut more times then none the artist is left with the scraps which in my opinion isn't fair considering how hard they work so my thing is we shouldn't judge artists for wanting extra money so they can assure thier financial stability Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argentum 1,177 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 ah yes what art is all about... competition "Δεν είσαι αγάπη. Δεν είσαι αγάπη. Είσαι οφθαλμαπάτη. Η τέλεια οφθαλμαπάτη" - Λαίδη Γκάγκα, 2016 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pachinko 9,415 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 19 hours ago, bionic said: Spotify rig it for him so it would be totally meaningless and basically just a way for artists to money launder How money launder? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 43,894 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 19 hours ago, Luv u Sum said: i think that's very fair maybe not for the reason he's sayyingggg but spotify does not pay artists enough and if someone like drake is bringing so much money to spotify then they should be compensated as such I disagree... This is just another way for artists that already make a lot of money cuz they are huge to make even more money Meanwhile average artists would never hit these milestones Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Economy 43,894 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 1 hour ago, the plastix doll said: which is understandable however after the label takes thier cut more times then none the artist is left with the scraps which in my opinion isn't fair considering how hard they work so my thing is we shouldn't judge artists for wanting extra money so they can assure thier financial stability I agree when talking about regular artists But I do not feel sorry for A-List celebs who are often among the comainers The amount of money they still make, capitalism has worked in their favour not against them despite whatever amount a label may take Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy scheisse 20,061 Posted February 3, 2023 Share Posted February 3, 2023 It’s fine and all but it lies on the premise that music is a competition and I really dislike that mentality. But he is the most commercialized rapper of present day after all so shouldn’t be surprised that he views music as a competition to win Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.