Justin Bieber sued by a photographer

[SharkmanthaC 104,790]

38 minutes ago, Mother of Puppies said:

Yes, but if Justin didn't exist, this photo wouldn't even exist. So in this case it's stupid. In my country u could sue the photographer because you have to have permission if u want to take a photograph of someone. So here Justin could basically sue the photographer for taking a pic of him without permission.

In the US, you it's legal to take a photo/film someone if they're in public. Thus how paparazzi's get away with some crazy things.

[Meat 18,960]

5 hours ago, AnnaNicoleSmith said:

It’s true. It’s just that he’s a stalker, you take pics without permission of people you don’t know. He deserves no credits

That’s not how the law works 

[Mother of Puppies 34,146]

9 minutes ago, Meat said:

That’s not how the law works 

Well, in most of Europe it does work like that. (Just not in the US it seems which is why paparazzi have a job)

[Lextyr97 17,348]

6 hours ago, Juanlittlem said:

I mean, that's his work Paparazzis take pictures and people will have to pay/give credit for it, it's always been like that.

It should be illegal to take pictures of people and profit off of it without their permission