FATCAT 49,741 Posted January 13 1 minute ago, Gabi001 said: Why are Americans so opposed to universal health care? I don't get it. They aren’t, it’s just that Republicans have programmed their base to believe it’s “socialism”. We just have to take a slower approach to reprogramming them before we can get there like a public option Purr more, hiss less. 2 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
Economy 34,555 Posted January 14 28 minutes ago, HorusRa2 said: Thats fair but literally every primary exit poll shows majority support for Medicare for All. National polls now still show a majority support for it. I dont think anyone can just generalize all of those data points and interpret it as anything other than people support that policy. No I know that. I was talking about politician support in general and who they vote for vs another  I wasn't talking about healthcare specifically in that comment  Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
Chromatican 3,691 Posted January 14 21 minutes ago, Gabi001 said: Why are Americans so opposed to universal health care? I don't get it. Because it is is “socialized medicine” Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
Chromatican 3,691 Posted January 14 19 minutes ago, FATCAT said: They aren’t, it’s just that Republicans have programmed their base to believe it’s “socialism”. We just have to take a slower approach to reprogramming them before we can get there like a public option 90% of Democrats and 50% of Republicans support universal healthcare though. It is a bipartisan effort to stop it. 3 1 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
HorusRa2 4,520 Posted January 14 (edited) 2 hours ago, Economy said: No I know that. I was talking about politician support in general and who they vote for vs another  I wasn't talking about healthcare specifically in that comment  Ah, okay. That wasnt clear to me. I think its because people are more willing to vote against the person they like for the sake of the perceived electable candidate winning. Many people voted for Biden not because they agreed with him ideologically but because they perceived him to be the most electable against Trump. And considering the huge desire to make Trump a 1 term president, Biden won the primary more than decidedly as a result. Edited January 14 by HorusRa2 2 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
HorusRa2 4,520 Posted January 14 (edited) 2 hours ago, FATCAT said: They aren’t, it’s just that Republicans have programmed their base to believe it’s “socialism”. We just have to take a slower approach to reprogramming them before we can get there like a public option The speaker of the house is a democrat who supported single payer 30 years ago who now refuses to put a single payer healthcare bill on the floor for a vote. Thats not a slower approach. Thats obstructionism. Edited January 14 by HorusRa2 3 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
FATCAT 49,741 Posted January 14 44 minutes ago, HorusRa2 said: The speaker of the house is a democrat who supported single payer 30 years ago who now refuses to put a single payer healthcare bill on the floor for a vote. Thats not a slower approach. Thats obstructionism. Because it has no path to passing. Just because the speaker supports something doesn't mean it will pass. Purr more, hiss less. Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
HorusRa2 4,520 Posted January 14 (edited) 33 minutes ago, FATCAT said: Because it has no path to passing. Just because the speaker supports something doesn't mean it will pass. Not putting pressure on politicians to do anything still results in nothing getting done. Nancy doesnt support single payer anymore and that was my point. Also, its funny that when republicans refuse to put things to a vote they are evil obstructionists but when Nancy does it, its because it has no chance of passing. Im pretty sure thats what you call a double standard. Edited January 14 by HorusRa2 2 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
FATCAT 49,741 Posted January 14 1 hour ago, HorusRa2 said: Not putting pressure on politicians to do anything still results in nothing getting done. Nancy doesnt support single payer anymore and that was my point. Also, its funny that when republicans refuse to put things to a vote they are evil obstructionists but when Nancy does it, its because it has no chance of passing. Im pretty sure thats what you call a double standard. Those are two entirely different things, but I understand that distinction and nuance are not leftist strong suits. Purr more, hiss less. 1 1 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
TheQueenLG 2,469 Posted January 14 5 hours ago, FATCAT said: Bernie is fighting for Medicare for All, he’s just not doing it recklessly or being stupid about it. Throwing tantrums while we’re trying to beat a facist is the stupidest thing you can do. Bernie can be fighting for M4A yet still make strategical missteps. And those strategical missteps have a real-life cost. That’s all I’m saying. The reason we are the only wealthy country in the world to fail to have universal health care is because of politicians being bought off by corporations. It’s unfortunate that so many people have taken up the job of repeating corporate talking points. It’s a corporate talking point to claim that fighting for universal health care in meaningful ways that exercise leverage are simply “reckless” or “stupid.” Of course, there is no convincing evidence for this and these claims act as barriers to change. Don’t mistake replacing one fascist with a slightly more palatable fascist for advocacy for meaningful policies. That is the stupidest thing you can do. Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
SlipAway 565 Posted January 14 7 minutes ago, TheQueenLG said: Bernie can be fighting for M4A yet still make strategical missteps. And those strategical missteps have a real-life cost. That’s all I’m saying. The reason we are the only wealthy country in the world to fail to have universal health care is because of politicians being bought off by corporations. It’s unfortunate that so many people have taken up the job of repeating corporate talking points. It’s a corporate talking point to claim that fighting for universal health care in meaningful ways that exercise leverage are simply “reckless” or “stupid.” Of course, there is no convincing evidence for this and these claims act as barriers to change. Don’t mistake replacing one fascist with a slightly more palatable fascist for advocacy for meaningful policies. That is the stupidest thing you can do. I truly don't get your point. I had to close my savings account, people I truly cared for died and I'm 2 payings of rent of being homeless. I did vote for Bernie in the primaries. Where does that leave me? Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
TheQueenLG 2,469 Posted January 14 9 minutes ago, SlipAway said: I truly don't get your point. I had to close my savings account, people I truly cared for died and I'm 2 payings of rent of being homeless. I did vote for Bernie in the primaries. Where does that leave me? You are one of millions unfortunately. And the will of the people is being subverted by the corporate puppets that we call our political representatives. I voted for Bernie, as well. I do not think Bernie exercised his leverage/power in the way that would have been most helpful to the movement for universal health care. That is my point. Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
SlipAway 565 Posted January 14 4 minutes ago, TheQueenLG said: I do not think Bernie exercised his leverage/power in the way that would have been most helpful to the movement for universal health care. That is my point. That, I get. Maybe, he could've done better. Couldawouldashoulda. I honestly have left all of my energy in March and whatever happens, happens  Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
FATCAT 49,741 Posted January 14 1 hour ago, TheQueenLG said: Bernie can be fighting for M4A yet still make strategical missteps. And those strategical missteps have a real-life cost. That’s all I’m saying. The reason we are the only wealthy country in the world to fail to have universal health care is because of politicians being bought off by corporations. It’s unfortunate that so many people have taken up the job of repeating corporate talking points. It’s a corporate talking point to claim that fighting for universal health care in meaningful ways that exercise leverage are simply “reckless” or “stupid.” Of course, there is no convincing evidence for this and these claims act as barriers to change. Don’t mistake replacing one fascist with a slightly more palatable fascist for advocacy for meaningful policies. That is the stupidest thing you can do. The fact that you think Biden is a fascist says all that needs to be said. All I can say is that you’re uninformed, clearly. Purr more, hiss less. 2 Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter
TheQueenLG 2,469 Posted January 14 12 minutes ago, FATCAT said: The fact that you think Biden is a fascist says all that needs to be said. All I can say is that you’re uninformed, clearly. Demonstrate the differences in policy between Trump and Biden that justify calling the former a fascist but not the latter. I will wait. You’re clearly uninformed of Biden’s record and his proposals. Quote Share Link to post Share on other sites Facebook Twitter