Jump to content

đź’“ DAWN OF CHROMATICA đź’“

Follow Gaga Daily on Telegram
celeb

Dan Reed confronted on french TV, "Leaving Neverland"


Guest

Featured Posts

Gohan
8 minutes ago, Ayria said:

Huh? Of course people have lied, but it’s about 2% of all allegations. Y’all realize that tons of victims protect their abusers for years right? And most sexual assault isn’t reported? 

The man wanted to participate willingly in Michael VMA's tribute, he wanted to direct a project related to him. All of that AFTER he was dead, when he got multiple no(s) he came back with the accusations. Tell me how that can be believable.

tryna go ask Alice, tryna catch that rabbit
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Gohan said:

The man wanted to participate willingly in Michael VMA's tribute, he wanted to direct a project related to him. All of that AFTER he was dead, when he got multiple no(s) he came back with the accusations. Tell me how that can be believable.

Wade is only one accuser, but how vindictive would he have to be to lie for 7 years because he lost one job? That doesn’t really add up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kyanewest said:

Another side that's interesting if you're willing to watch

 

Piers Morgan is an absolute asshole. Again with the Feldman/Culkin bullshit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regina George
39 minutes ago, Ayria said:

Huh? Of course people have lied, but it’s about 2% of all allegations. Y’all realize that tons of victims protect their abusers for years right? And most sexual assault isn’t reported? 

At this point you are spamming every MJ thread. Are you okay? Do you need someone to talk to? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu
29 minutes ago, Ayria said:

Wade is only one accuser, but how vindictive would he have to be to lie for 7 years because he lost one job? That doesn’t really add up. 

Um... It's not just about one job. He has a court case for hundreds of millions of dollars too... So a lot at stake here :) 

His appeal is coming up later this year, how convenient.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu

Watching this... damn.. French media put its american counterparts to shame.

This is how you do investigative journalism. Even the journalist moderating this debate knows what she's talking about and has her receipts ready for both sides.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, nicolasrumet said:

Um... It's not just about one job. He has a court case for hundreds of millions of dollars too... So a lot at stake here :) 

His appeal is coming up later this year, how convenient.

Oh yeah I’m sure he contacted a director to sway public opinion and had his whole family take acting lessons and rehearse stories with another alleged victim to possibly win a court case. Why are you even worried about the appeal? You said there was zero evidence against him? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu
1 minute ago, Ayria said:

Oh yeah I’m sure he contacted a director to sway public opinion and had his whole family take acting lessons and rehearse stories with another alleged victim to possibly win a court case. Why are you even worried about the appeal? You said there was zero evidence against him? 

I have no doubt they're losing the appeal lol. No doubt in my mind and please remember this post, come back to me and publicly shame me if it turns out otherwise. I'll accept it! This documentary was in my opinion an attempt to sway the public opinion for their upcoming appeal this summer. It doesn't mean that they'll be successful.

Watch the debate.

It's really informative. Learn to hear both sides who are here debating in a very civil way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nicolasrumet said:

I have no doubt they're losing the appeal lol. No doubt in my mind and please remember this post, come back to me and publicly shame me if it turns out otherwise. I'll accept it! This documentary was in my opinion an attempt to sway the public opinion for their upcoming appeal this summer. It doesn't mean that they'll be successful.

Watch the debate.

It's really informative. Learn to hear both sides who are here debating in a very civil way.

I am hearing both sides. But MJ defenders seem to operate on an either/or mentality where they say if one thing is true then another must be false. They could want to win the appeal and also be victims of csa, correct? Why is everything either about money or about justice. Both can be true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chickens in Malibu
3 minutes ago, Ayria said:

I am hearing both sides. But MJ defenders seem to operate on an either/or mentality where they say if one thing is true then another must be false. They could want to win the appeal and also be victims of csa, correct? Why is everything either about money or about justice. Both can be true.

Because as the specialist in the debate says, money can't repair sexual assault victims. So filing a lawsuit for money against a dead man (who isn't even here to be ruled against in court) is a far cry from seeking justice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, nicolasrumet said:

Because as the specialist in the debate says, money can't repair sexual assault victims. So filing a lawsuit for money against a dead man (who isn't even here to be ruled against in court) is a far cry from seeking justice.

 

What else can they receive at this point though? Money can be used for therapy bills, time off of work, etc. And if I was molested by MJ you can bet your ass I’d want some money from that estate! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regina George
3 minutes ago, nicolasrumet said:

Because as the specialist in the debate says, money can't repair sexual assault victims. So filing a lawsuit for money against a dead man (who isn't even here to be ruled against in court) is a far cry from seeking justice.

 

Just let him/her be. It’s obvious they are not here for right discussion and they won’t read what you have to say. I myself gave them facts that rule out their “he’s guilty” arguments but he/she just chose not to read them because they are published on MJ fan website. What more do I need to tell you? Just let them think whatever they want to. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...