BUtterfield 8 37,926 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 While reps for Gaga did not respond to a request for comment, a source with knowledge of the situation says that Gaga had recently approached her label, Interscope Records, asking for their help in removing “Do What U Want” from iTunes and streaming services, and the label quickly moved to coordinate with the major digital music services in getting the song taken down. The source said that Gaga “wanted to send a message” by removing the song in addition to denouncing the past collaboration. How can Gaga erase one of her top 20 hits without affecting those still receiving royalties from its streams and downloads? In addition to Kelly as its featured artist, “Do What U Want” has four more credited writers: Gaga, Paul Blair (better known as DJ White Shadow, who also co-produced the song with Gaga), Martin Bresso (a songwriter-producer who records as Tchami) and William Grigahcine (also known as global hitmaker DJ Snake). Prior to a song being released, co-writers are typically at the whim of the artist recording the song as to whether that track will appear on an album or be selected as a single -- especially when the artist is also listed as a co-writer, as Gaga is on “Do What U Want.” Although it’s extremely rare for an artist to decide to release a song and then un-release it, that same control would apply, and the co-writers would not have a say in what happens to the availability of the record. It’s also worth noting that “Do What U Want” is credited as a Lady Gaga song featuring R. Kelly, not as a duet between Gaga and Kelly. In instances where the word “featuring” is used, those artists typically are not paid artist royalties for that song, instead being compensated with an upfront fee or by trading favors. Therefore, Kelly is likely not missing out on any royalties as the guest star on the version of “Do What U Want” that has been removed. Most importantly, Gaga needed the support of Interscope and parent company Universal Music Group in removing “Do What U Want” from digital music services after the label released the song as part of ARTPOP. Interscope/UMG hypothetically could have blocked the removal of the song since they own Gaga’s masters, but considering that Gaga is one of the label’s flagship artists -- and that few within the industry currently want to align themselves with Kelly and attempt to protect his art -- the label’s decision to help Gaga was undoubtedly a simple one. https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/8493148/how-lady-gaga-removed-r-kelly-collaboration-streaming-services?utm_source=facebook Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChromaticPrincess 1,346 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, Rainbow1 said: While reps for Gaga did not respond to a request for comment, a source with knowledge of the situation says that Gaga had recently approached her label, Interscope Records, asking for their help in removing “Do What U Want” from iTunes and streaming services, and the label quickly moved to coordinate with the major digital music services in getting the song taken down. The source said that Gaga “wanted to send a message” by removing the song in addition to denouncing the past collaboration. How can Gaga erase one of her top 20 hits without affecting those still receiving royalties from its streams and downloads? In addition to Kelly as its featured artist, “Do What U Want” has four more credited writers: Gaga, Paul Blair (better known as DJ White Shadow, who also co-produced the song with Gaga), Martin Bresso (a songwriter-producer who records as Tchami) and William Grigahcine (also known as global hitmaker DJ Snake). Prior to a song being released, co-writers are typically at the whim of the artist recording the song as to whether that track will appear on an album or be selected as a single -- especially when the artist is also listed as a co-writer, as Gaga is on “Do What U Want.” Although it’s extremely rare for an artist to decide to release a song and then un-release it, that same control would apply, and the co-writers would not have a say in what happens to the availability of the record. It’s also worth noting that “Do What U Want” is credited as a Lady Gaga song featuring R. Kelly, not as a duet between Gaga and Kelly. In instances where the word “featuring” is used, those artists typically are not paid artist royalties for that song, instead being compensated with an upfront fee or by trading favors. Therefore, Kelly is likely not missing out on any royalties as the guest star on the version of “Do What U Want” that has been removed. Most importantly, Gaga needed the support of Interscope and parent company Universal Music Group in removing “Do What U Want” from digital music services after the label released the song as part of ARTPOP. Interscope/UMG hypothetically could have blocked the removal of the song since they own Gaga’s masters, but considering that Gaga is one of the label’s flagship artists -- and that few within the industry currently want to align themselves with Kelly and attempt to protect his art -- the label’s decision to help Gaga was undoubtedly a simple one. https://www.billboard.com/articles/business/8493148/how-lady-gaga-removed-r-kelly-collaboration-streaming-services?utm_source=facebook so then he won't get royalties for the solo version or the xtina remix? ✨oh the lights dim while we’re dancing yeah the floor is shaking in this disco heaven✨ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quartz 11,923 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Fascinating Inside, we are really made the same. 🕊 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runway 27,876 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Gaga doesn’t own her masters confirmed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
retroglamx 5,087 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 EDUCATE HA so considering this, I think Gaga took a while to voice her opinion on R. Kelly because she was waiting for UMG to give her the green light for removing the song. Pink flamingos always fascinated me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAmNotHere1997 25,824 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Runway said: Gaga doesn’t own her masters confirmed what does that mean? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHALLOW 14,815 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Ok but can she release the solo version or include the Christina featuring in ARTPOP? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic 11,922 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, retroglamx said: EDUCATE HA so considering this, I think Gaga took a while to voice her opinion on R. Kelly because she was waiting for UMG to give her the green light for removing the song. I don't think so. As BB said it was a simple decision to make. She probably had just hoped it would blow over but the backlash got too big. The hardest thing in this world is to live in it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiscoHeaven23 35,007 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 Gaga has Interscope by their balls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizzie Jacobson 416 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 9 minutes ago, PrincessVenus said: so then he won't get royalties for the solo version or the xtina remix? He didn’t write or contribute to them in any way so I don’t think he would Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red 86,690 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 There is so much bureaucracy behind music OMG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
monketsharona 44,359 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 20 minutes ago, PrincessVenus said: so then he won't get royalties for the solo version or the xtina remix? R. Kelly only wrote his part on the main version so no he is not credited on Christina's version Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChromaticPrincess 1,346 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, monketsharona said: R. Kelly only wrote his part on the main version so no he is not credited on Christina's version so then why was everybody saying that he'd be getting royalties on Christina's version ✨oh the lights dim while we’re dancing yeah the floor is shaking in this disco heaven✨ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enzo 37,977 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 1 minute ago, monketsharona said: R. Kelly only wrote his part on the main version so no he is not credited on Christina's version he is tho 툭 까보면 어김없이 소리질러와 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlopSlurper 34,336 Posted January 11, 2019 Share Posted January 11, 2019 So Rapist Kelly doesn't get royalties, why did she remove the xtina one? this is a mess Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.