Regina George 59,387 Posted November 26, 2018 Share Posted November 26, 2018 6 minutes ago, Gypsy Life said: Britney Spears IS the worst thing to happen to music in the last quarter-century (I'd say ever but let's go with quarter century) and that doesn't mean she has any impact, because she has none. Now you know. Be objective. She is iconic and youâll have to deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
migamiga 12,067 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 On 11/25/2018 at 7:19 AM, Aglaya said: Britney feels fake, like a robot, and she doesn't even try to sing since 1900. Well at least sheâs had the longevity to last 118 years. Your fave could never Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guillaume Hamon 5,543 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 21 hours ago, ReginaGeorge said: She was better dancer than all of the industry then and now. I agree she was better than all of them except maybe for janet jackson at her peak.  Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bio 23,538 Posted November 27, 2018 Share Posted November 27, 2018 Larry Rudolph's impact Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mzncb 332 Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 On 11/26/2018 at 1:36 PM, DCgaga said: No Iâm not comparing her, Iâm just saying. There will be a time 10-20 years from now where most of the generation isnât even gonna know who Britney is, and sheâs basically the modern day Paula Abdul, but do we ever hear from her? Once again, not comparing, just using her as an example đ Obviously the difference is that Toxic is going to be consistently played decades from now no matter how irrelevant Britney is or what she does in the future, unlike Paula Abdul's music. On 11/26/2018 at 1:44 PM, Gypsy Life said: Britney Spears IS the worst thing to happen to music in the last quarter-century (I'd say ever but let's go with quarter century) and that doesn't mean she has any impact, because she has none. Now you know. You've just admitted Britney Spears is the most impactful female (arguably overall ) music act of the last quarter century. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mzncb 332 Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 On 11/27/2018 at 4:17 AM, Bio said: Larry Rudolph's impact Larry Rudolph has successfully managed who else again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bio 23,538 Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 13 minutes ago, mzncb said: Larry Rudolph has successfully managed who else again? Backstreet Boys, Justin Timberlake, Avril Lavigne, Miley Cyrus, among others. But his main priority has always been Britney. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gumzy3000 6,425 Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 Britney is in her own weird category altogether. I would not say she is a singer but more of an entertainer. She is definitely not the worst thing that happened to the music industry but people do not like her because she lipsynchs way too much. I mean, almost all the female singers today who are popular can somewhat sing. Britney did not but she made up for it by her dancing. Also, Britney was way too manufactured by her record label and it can really make one question her authenticity and the meaningfulness of her music. Again, she is an entertainer, I would never listen to a Britney song the way I listen to a Taylor Swift or Adele song for example. Mainstream pop now has become smarter I would say and singers are challenging race, gender, politics, and sexuality in their works. The lyrics are also a bit better than the 2000s and the singers do have some singing ability. While this is good, it is not as entertaining as when Britney was dominating the world in the late 90s and 2000s. Just for that alone makes her an icon and DEFINITELY not the worst thing to happen to music in the past century. trolly troll troll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr S 7,615 Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 SHe definitely had a pop culture impact. I may get hate for this, but I really don't see what her music impact is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC 25,164 Posted December 13, 2018 Share Posted December 13, 2018 2 hours ago, mzncb said: Obviously the difference is that Toxic is going to be consistently played decades from now no matter how irrelevant Britney is or what she does in the future, unlike Paula Abdul's music. You've just admitted Britney Spears is the most impactful female (arguably overall ) music act of the last quarter century. Stop replying to old quotes đ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mzncb 332 Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 4 hours ago, Bio said: Backstreet Boys, Justin Timberlake, Avril Lavigne, Miley Cyrus, among others. But his main priority has always been Britney. Backstreet Boys were already successful before him. Timberlake also had another manager and Avril Lavigne Miley Cyrus and the rest of his clients have languished under his managerial leadership.  Doesn't mean he isn't smart and knowledgeable, but if Britney doesn't have a career I see no reason why Larry Rudolph deserves one either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mzncb 332 Posted December 13, 2018 Author Share Posted December 13, 2018 3 hours ago, DCgaga said: Stop replying to old quotes đ But it's true though. As a performer, she's essentially the Paula Abdul of her time but Toxic will be played/popular DECADES from now, unlike any of Paula Abdul's music while Baby One More Time defined an era. So how do you really quantify her? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.