Der Meister 3,000 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just now, Kefir said: 'No' was referring to the question about 2 latest tweets. Then he said 'too'. Which means more. Go learn english. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyDelRey 21,101 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just now, Der Meister said: Go learn english. Stop being rude, or leave this site. He was clearly saying that he's working on other projects besides LG5, but he added 'too' which means that he's working on LG5. The only prisons that exist are ones we put each other in.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobster 14,604 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 #Impact #WithoutEvenTrying #FunkThePunk But I'm only a man and I do what I can. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJHolland 12,723 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Ded Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 9,133 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 1 minute ago, Bakki Del Rey said: Stop being rude, or leave this site. He was clearly saying that he's working on other projects besides LG5, but he added 'too' which means that he's working on LG5. not necessarily. he could have meant like "no, my whole job doesnt revolve around Lady Gaga, i have other jobs too" . suggestion that he might not be working on LG5. basically it can be taken both ways, so this isnt a confirmation Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bette Davis 12,742 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 confirm [kuh n-furm] verb (used with object) 1.to establish the truth, accuracy, validity, orgenuineness of; corroborate; verify. ...AKA not this Cold as ice cream, but still as sweet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGD 11,752 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Hm... "No. I work on different records too" "No. I work on different records, too" They both can mean the same thing (that he could be or is mixing LG5.), the latter just emphasizes that he is working on other records. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyDelRey 21,101 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just now, andy232000 said: not necessarily. he could have meant like "no, my whole job doesnt revolve around Lady Gaga, i have other jobs too" . suggestion that he might not be working on LG5. basically it can be taken both ways, so this isnt a confirmation Take a look on his old tweets, if that's the real Phil, then he is definitely involved in the whole LG5 making process. The only prisons that exist are ones we put each other in.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy232000 9,133 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just now, Bakki Del Rey said: Take a look on his old tweets, if that's the real Phil, then he is definitely involved in the whole LG5 making process. im not saying he isnt, im just saying that his "too" doesnt 100% confirm anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HolyDelRey 21,101 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 1 minute ago, andy232000 said: im not saying he isnt, im just saying that his "too" doesnt 100% confirm anything. But yeah i agree, they both can mean the same thing. The difference its in the (,) The only prisons that exist are ones we put each other in.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Der Meister 3,000 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 4 minutes ago, Bakki Del Rey said: Take a look on his old tweets, if that's the real Phil, then he is definitely involved in the whole LG5 making process. Stop being delusional. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desperado 2,439 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 25 minutes ago, Bakki Del Rey said: I don't belive this account for some reason. I doubt that's the real Phill, since 'he' created that account when the LG5 rumours started, and when you check his official website, on the social media section, his twitter account it's no where to be found. Also, producers can't spill any details about an arist/album untill they got permission for that. So definitely no. he was the first who spilled about i want your love tho and it being gaga when that teaser appeared Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lego 44,165 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 10 minutes ago, Mobster said: #Impact #WithoutEvenTrying #FunkThePunk Second image from some interview when you google his name... how is that not suspicious? It's like that Britney's corn picture on Instagram. FreePalestine Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunkTheFunk 121,498 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Gaga's lead single confirmed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mobster 14,604 Posted January 22, 2016 Share Posted January 22, 2016 Just now, VampireHeart said: Second image from some interview when you google his name... how is that not suspicious? It's like that Britney's corn picture on Instagram. I can't believe you saw that mess of a thread where everyone ganged up on me But I'm only a man and I do what I can. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.