Nein 508 Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 Can they make up their mind? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
StefJAGermanotta 2 Posted October 6, 2014 Share Posted October 6, 2014 They may have different writers, but they only have so many editors who okayed their articles to publish, no? Excellent point here. I think being Forbes, it appears they like things if they're successful, so now that C2C is #1, then praise. However, if the second week sales flounders, then they'll blast Gaga, is my feeling. It's like my free subscription to the awful Wall Street Journal (it was free, so why not, boy was I wrong), where literally every article would end in a cost a--lysis. i.e. The cat saved her owner from a fire. If the owner required hospitalization, that would have cost at least 150K with the rising costs of hospitalization. At the same time, feeding and caring for a cat costs approximately 1000/year x 5 years which is $5000. Therefore, we would say it was worth having the cat with savings of 145K. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wet Fire 5,676 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Interesting... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pharamon 6,659 Posted October 7, 2014 Share Posted October 7, 2014 Forbes as whole is a LIAR if she wasnt that successful they would easily call her a flop Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagaloo911 12,959 Posted October 9, 2014 Share Posted October 9, 2014 The flip flopping It's called being impartial. Giving thought and consideration to both sides. It's what good journalism, and even more so, good science, does Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AgusPop 4,064 Posted October 13, 2014 Share Posted October 13, 2014 Slay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trending Now
New Threads
Trending Now
New Threads
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.