Jump to content

Photo

Infected Mushroom talks "Aura"


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
628 replies to this topic

Senior Member

2,439 posts

#1

Infected_mushroom.jpg

 

The following is taken off Infected Mushroom's interview with Israeli weekend newspaper "Sheva Leylot" (7 Nights), translated by me:

 "She (Gaga) came into Zedd's studio, her producer, while he was working on our track", says I-zen. "It was one of its first demos she immediately fell in love with. Zedd called us saying "There's a problem. Lady Gaga wants your song."
We had some serious deliberation, we see ourselves as a band with a high artistic integrity and we avoid commercialization and doing cheap things such as Britney or Gaga. But suddenly there's a concrete offer on the table and saying "No" is a mistake, because it's a guaranteed lifelong pension. Each time the song is being played or sold, we get some pretty nice royalties. So we decided to give her the melody, as long as we are signed under our private names. We felt embarrassment for our fans. But she refused, she wanted "Infected Mushroom" to be credited. So, we decided to go for it thinking it won't make the cut or she'll eventually change her mind.

But she didn't. Do you like the result?

No. I think it's an artistic compromise. The song is too cheesy and commercialized. The way her vocals are over the melody is bad. But, what do I know about pop hits? we are honored that someone off Gaga's league found potential in our track and loved it.

 

 

Gaga is being mentioned again when they are talking about turning down Madonna's offer to be her opening act:

Our collaboration with Gaga will also expose us the an audience that haven't heard of us before. But when this new audience will come to our show expecting to hear similar songs to "Aura", they'll be disappointed.

 

 

I scanned the Gaga-related part off the interview, so you can check it (if you speaks Hebrew). :sweat: relevant quotes are marked, (those which are translated above):

111pn50.jpg


Senior Member

9,409 posts

#2

:rip:

 

I'm gonna cut their heads.

Senior Member

1,311 posts

#3

Wow…why are some many people only in it for the money :(


Audio Remixer

3,268 posts

#4

Wow ****ing hipster assholes :wtf: :usrs:


Senior Member

2,286 posts

#5

wow they dont sound very happy with what she did with the song.

 

"There's a problem. Lady Gaga wants your song"  :toofunny:


Senior Member

6,927 posts

#6

Wow. How extremely rude of them :wtf:


Senior Member

1,006 posts

#7

Wow. :rip: They're entitled to their opinions, but they could have said no.


Senior Member

5,269 posts

#8

:noparty:


Moderator

10,527 posts

#9

I kinda love that they're annoyed but still let her use it, speaks volumes :rip:


Senior Member

1,311 posts

#10

Like, yea of course they are entitled to their opinion and artistic vision..but to rack on everything about Gaga so harshly..wow


Senior Member

5,211 posts

#11

wow lol


Senior Member

6,927 posts

#12

 

we avoid commercialization and doing cheap things such as Britney or Gaga.

:wtf: :wtf: :wtf:


Senior Member

3,436 posts

#13

Ew


Senior Member

6,696 posts

#14

Wow ****ing hipster assholes :wtf: :usrs:

 

:awkney:


Senior Member

8,881 posts

#15

How f*cking rude. :wtf:


Banned

6,553 posts

#16

lol. "we want to make a living doing this but will bite the hand that feeds us" have some respect you idiots.


Senior Member

6,927 posts

#17

And funny how they think it's commercial yet our fanbase thinks otherwise :toofunny:


Senior Member

5,536 posts

#18

tumblr_mj1haoJgjF1rfduvxo1_500.gif


Senior Member

18,205 posts

#19

:lmao:

 

Well, at least they were honest. 


Senior Member

7,070 posts

#20

What the actual ****.



0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

  • Change Theme
  • Gaga Daily. 2009-2013. Privacy Policy Contact Advertise with us Powered by IP Board