shoful 13,304 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Does anyone else get the vibe that the Joanne era has been an attempt to make a lot of money. I feel that they are milking this era for everything that its worth. How many times this era has Gaga posted on social media that theres new (super expensive for waht youre getting)merchandise? And this new emoji app that costs money. "My name is Dita, I'll be your Mistress tonight..." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBlue 993 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 In my opinion,it was really cheap loving you was blue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagadonna 10,801 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I don't think so. If she really wanted to make a lot of money, she would have made Joanne a commercial album with generic potential hits (which is obviously not the case). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gagadonna 10,801 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Just now, Beyond said: In my opinion,it's really cheap tbh Your opinion is cheap. Joanne is a masterpiece Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LaBlue 993 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, Gagadonna said: Your opinion is cheap. Joanne is a masterpiece Okay,monster.Stop your ratchet behavior and start having life You gotta learn that people have different opinions about Joanne,it's natural to be different,honey loving you was blue Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
911 16,206 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 7 minutes ago, Beyond said: In my opinion,it was really cheap 𝕞𝕪 𝕓𝕚𝕘𝕘𝕖𝕤𝕥 𝕖𝕟𝕖𝕞𝕪 𝕚𝕤 𝕞𝕖, 𝕡𝕠𝕡 𝕒 𝟡𝟙𝟙 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
venusfly 17,879 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I don't see a problem with it if she is, there's not much to complain about when her label gives her nice budgets and more freedom Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Surrealist 27,470 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Yes, she is, but let her do her what she wants, since she doesn't care for anything anymore. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werk 13,165 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Some of y'all are saying how she'd then have generic hits but like I think they're milking the era as in image-wise such as how Gaga is so stripped down this era if that makes sense which will lead to attention Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronk 14,070 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 43 minutes ago, Werk said: Some of y'all are saying how she'd then have generic hits but like I think they're milking the era as in image-wise such as how Gaga is so stripped down this era if that makes sense which will lead to attention I think that's just how she feels rn. I don't thing Gaga herself is going commercial. I live outside the space time continuum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
King J 1,541 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 I think because the album wasnt commercial she is trying to milk her image which was revived via the Superbowl. So it's as if she is selling herself off of GP perceptions, in a bling not the music way. Rowt ay soyng aybouwt yer eyesh, ayt ay sliysche ohf cherreh pye. Eye crei'd awl noiyght. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werk 13,165 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 15 minutes ago, Ronk said: I think that's just how she feels rn. I don't thing Gaga herself is going commercial. No I meant like Interscopes taking advantage of that lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronk 14,070 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 Just now, Werk said: No I meant like Interscopes taking advantage of that lol Yeah, there are always plenty of people who profit from any artist's commercial success, and they may do things that the artist wouldn't do. I live outside the space time continuum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkchylde 14,857 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 honestly i don't give a sh*t, if y'all pay 70$ for a badly designed tee it's your own fault. for the rest of it, she has the right to milk her brand Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Delulu Rogers 6,359 Posted May 19, 2017 Share Posted May 19, 2017 If she were milking it JW and DIC would have been singles, there would have been a different lead, a better MR video and proper promo for the album Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Featured Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.